OFF SITE/EVENING & WEEKEND APPOINTMENTS AVAILABLE
TELEPHONES ANSWERED 24 HOURS A DAY

FREE CONSULTATION

312-629-0669

Recent Blog Posts

The Crime of Unlawful Mailing and Suspicious Packages

 Posted on November 08, 2019 in Fraud

Illionois defense attorney, Illinois criminal defense lawyerAnyone that has ever been to the post office to mail a package is familiar with the questions postal workers ask. One of those is whether or not the package contains anything that is flammable, toxic, or otherwise potentially dangerous. Most people immediately say the package does not contain any of those contents. Truthfully, most cannot even remember what the postal worker said. However, listening to this question and responding truthfully is important. If you do mail any of those prohibited items, even by mistake, you can be charged with a federal offense.

What Is Unlawful Mailing and Suspicious Packages?

The offense of unlawful mailing and suspicious packages is covered under 39 U.S.C. Section 3001. This lengthy statute outlines a laundry list of offenses pertaining to sending mail through the United States Postal Services (USPS).

When a person is suspected of committing one of the offenses stated in the statute, an investigation is conducted. This investigation typically includes the USPS and their branch of law enforcement, the United States Postal Inspection Service. In certain cases, the Department of Justice (DOJ) may also get involved.

Continue Reading ››

The Different Types of Social Security Fraud

 Posted on October 25, 2019 in Fraud

fraudA wild story emerged recently about a man that lived as his dead relative for over a decade, at least when it came to the deceased’s Social Security benefits. The man tricked the government into thinking that the deceased man was still alive and living with the fraudster. Federal agents caught on eventually and, after questioning the man, charged him with deceased payee fraud.

The story sounds outrageous, but it happens more often than people think. In fact, in 2018 alone, the Social Security Administration (SSA) paid out over $40 million to 500 dead people in just three states. Those states were Texas, Maryland, and Michigan. This, however, is just one type of Social Security fraud and all of them are taken very seriously by the federal government. The most common types of this kind of fraud are below.

Making False Statements

When a person claims Social Security benefits, it is expected that they will be completely honest in their application. Sometimes people do not do this because they want to claim more benefits. So for example, they may state that they do not have any income when that is not true.

Continue Reading ››

The Crime of Falsifying Records to Obstruct an Investigation

 Posted on October 18, 2019 in Fraud

falsifying-documentsRecently, two men connected to a well-known attorney were charged with many offenses after it was found that they were trying to leave the country. One of these crimes was falsifying records to obstruct an investigation. This currently has people around the country wondering what the penalties are for this crime, and what exactly the offense entails.

What is Falsifying Records?

Under federal law, it is a crime to destroy, alter, or falsify records in connection with a federal investigation. It is also a crime to commit any of these acts with records during bankruptcy proceedings. Altering documents in regards to an audit is also an offense that could have someone facing federal prosecution. Taking public records and hiding them, or walking away with them, is also considered falsifying records. Before securing a conviction though, there are certain things the prosecution must prove. If they can, those charged face very harsh penalties.

Continue Reading ››

Three Common Federal Firearm Laws

 Posted on October 11, 2019 in Weapons

Illionois defense attorney, Illinois criminal defense lawyerFederal firearm laws are complicated and carry harsh penalties. These laws are not only complex, but they also provide federal prosecutors with an immense arsenal of weapons when prosecuting those accused. This has resulted in a huge increase in prosecutions under the federal laws on firearms. Due to the fact that these prosecutions have become more prevalent, it is essential that everyone understands the law, so they do not find themselves under federal investigation. Below are three of the most common charges prosecutors pursue.

Selling Guns Illegally

There are multiple federal firearm laws pertaining to the sale of firearms, including licensing requirements and restrictions on transporting certain weapons across state lines. Under 18 U.S.C. Section 922(a), it is against the law to sell guns across state lines without a valid license. Selling firearms without any type of license carries a five-year sentence in federal prison for those convicted.

Continue Reading ››

What Happens During Sentencing in Federal Court?

 Posted on October 04, 2019 in Federal Crimes

Illionois defense attorney, Illinois criminal defense lawyerIf you have been convicted of a federal crime such as embezzlement or a violation of The Controlled Substances Act, the next process you will face is sentencing. What happens during sentencing is incredibly important, as that is when the judge will tell you how much time you will serve in jail, or if you will serve any at all. There is a period of time between the conviction and when you receive your sentencing, and it is important to understand what will happen during that time. Below is an outline of the procedure that will take place before you appear for your sentencing hearing.

The Pre-Sentence Report

After your conviction, a probation officer will interview you. During this interview, they will ask about your family history, social history, education background, financial situation, and other various details about your life. They will then write a pre-sentence report.

Once the pre-sentence report is created, it is sent to the judge, the prosecutor, and your defense lawyer. After receiving it, you will have an opportunity to object to anything that is contained within the report. There are both big and small objections. A federal criminal defense attorney can advise on which objections are most important to make.

Continue Reading ››

Options After a Federal Crime Conviction

 Posted on September 27, 2019 in Federal Crimes

convictionBeing convicted of a federal crime such as bankruptcy fraud or embezzlement is a scary thing. Upon hearing the conviction, accused individuals wonder what they are going to do, and what comes next. They may consider filing an appeal, but this is not the only recourse a person has. There are several options other than an appeal and, with the right federal criminal defense attorney, a conviction does not always mean the case is closed. Below are some of the common options sought by those that have been convicted.

Appeal

Often, an appeal is the first thing a person considers after a conviction. This can be done when a lower court made a mistake deciding, or interpreting, the legal statutes involved with a case. There are many common bases for appeals including:

  • Fourth Amendment violations
  • Incompetent legal representation
  • Evidence was withheld that would have exonerated the defendant
  • Sentencing was overly harsh

Continue Reading ››

What Is the Federal Crime of Human Trafficking?

 Posted on September 20, 2019 in Human Trafficking

Illionois defense attorney, Illinois criminal defense lawyerRecently, a Pensacola man was charged with human trafficking in three different states. The charges came after multiple federal search warrants turned up evidence of this offense and a number of others in several massage parlors across the country. While some have heard of human trafficking, whether through movies or news reports, few completely understand what this crime entails. Sometimes this includes those charged. It is important that anyone facing charges understands what possible penalties they face, and how a Chicago federal defense attorney can help. Understanding the Crime of Human Trafficking Human trafficking occurs when one person smuggles, conceals, or obtains people through the use of force or threat of force. Transporting a person under these means is also considered human trafficking. While most people are familiar with the term, ‘human trafficking,’ the legal statute refers to the offense as involuntary servitude, forced labor, and sex trafficking. The statute on human trafficking also includes language further defining human trafficking as defrauding a person through an abuse of power when the above conditions are met. This also includes using a person to make a profit while exploiting them. Penalties for Human Trafficking Human trafficking is considered to be an extremely serious crime in the United States. As such, those convicted face up to 20 years in federal prison if they are convicted of the crime. If a person died as a result of human trafficking, those penalties are increased to life imprisonment. Sex trafficking also carries harsher sentences than human trafficking that does not involve sex offenses. When children are involved in sex trafficking, or the victim was defrauded, forced, or coerced to perform sexual acts, the minimum sentence is ten years in federal prison. Convictions for these offenses can also result in a life imprisonment sentence. In addition to the prison sentences and potential fines that are sentenced in human trafficking convictions, those accused may also have to appear on the sex offender registry. This can make it extremely difficult to find employment and housing in the future and will affect just about every aspect of the defendant’s life. The penalties for human trafficking may also vary, depending on the person’s role in the offense. For example, if someone drove the vehicle that transported the victims of human trafficking, they may face up to seven years in federal prison, even if they did not actively participate in the trafficking. Need Help with Federal Charges? Call Our Illinois Federal Defense Attorney

If you have been charged with human trafficking or any other federal crime, it is important you get the help of an experienced Chicago federal defense attorney. At the Law Offices of Hal M. Garfinkel, we know these cases are not as hopeless as they seem. We also know there are defenses available, and how to use them to build you the solid defense you need. Call us today at 312-629-0669 or fill out our online form for your free consultation. We are committed to helping those wrongly accused, and we want to help you, too.

Continue Reading ››

Common Defenses to Identity Theft

 Posted on September 13, 2019 in Identity Theft

Illionois defense attorney, Illinois criminal defense lawyerA recent story involving a U.S. astronaut has made headlines around the country. The astronaut, who spent six months onboard the International Space Station, has returned home, but the headlines may not be what she expected. Instead of being touted for her work, she is instead under scrutiny for a possible identity theft crime. While on board the ISS, she used a computer to look into her ex-wife’s bank account. She claims she was only trying to ensure there was enough money to care for their son, but she could face charges of identity theft. The astronaut in question is likely shocked to come home to this story, as most people are when they are accused of identity theft. However, there is hope. There are many common defenses federal criminal defense attorneys use in identity theft cases, and they are found below. Authorized Use When a person has given another person to use their identity, the person that uses it cannot be found guilty of identity theft. This is true even if the person stole money or something of value while assuming the identity. This sounds like an unreal situation, but it is more common than one would think. For example, a mother gives her son her bank card to go buy some groceries. While at the store, he purchases items his mom did not give permission for. While he should not have bought those items, he cannot be charged with identity theft because he was given permission to use the bank card. Lack of a Crime Simply stealing another person’s identity is not necessarily a crime, although in certain circumstances, such as hacking, it could constitute one. However, in many cases simply obtaining someone’s personal information is not a crime if nothing is done with that information. For example, if a credit card is mailed to the wrong house and a person at that address opens it, they have obtained a person’s credit card information. They can only be charged with a crime, though, if they use that credit card. If they cut it up and throw it out, or even keep it but never use it, they have not committed a crime. Lack of Intent Like so many crimes, identity theft cases often hinge on intent. Without intent, there is no crime. For example, two sales agents share the same first and last name. An administrative error allows one agent access to the other’s business account. Without realizing it, they use the funds in the account. They cannot be charged with an identity theft crime because they did not have the intent to take money from the account that was not rightfully theirs. Need a Good Defense? Call Our Illinois Federal Criminal Defense Attorney

Facing charges of identity theft is always shocking, even when the alleged act was not performed in space. If you have been charged with a crime, you need the help of our experienced Chicago federal criminal defense attorney. At the Law Offices of Hal M. Garfinkel, we will work hard to prepare the defense you need and give you the best chance of a possible outcome in court. Call us today at 312-629-0669 for your free consultation to learn how we can help.

Continue Reading ››

What Are the Levels of Intent in Federal Criminal Cases?

 Posted on September 06, 2019 in Criminal Defense

Illionois defense attorney, Illinois criminal defense lawyerDuring a federal criminal trial, prosecutors have to prove a number of elements in their case. One of those elements is the legal concept of ‘mens rea’ or criminal intent. This is true in most cases, although there are certain cases that rest on strict liability and do not include the requirement of intent. Not only must the prosecution prove intent, but there are also four different levels of intent they must prove. The level they must prove will depend on the statute involved in the case. Below, those four levels of intent are examined more closely.

The Accused Acted Knowingly

There are many criminal statutes that only require the prosecution to prove the defendant acted knowingly. This means that the defendant simply knew what they were doing. The prosecution does not have to prove that the defendant knew what they were doing was against the law. For example, 18 U.S.C. Section 1512(b) states that it is illegal to intimidate or threaten a person that could be a witness for the federal prosecution. If the prosecution can prove a person knowingly did this, they do not have to also prove the defendant knew it was illegal.

Continue Reading ››

What to Expect if You Are Involved in an Opioid Investigation

 Posted on August 29, 2019 in Drug Crimes

Illionois defense attorney, Illinois criminal defense lawyerIn 2017, then Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the government’s war on opioids. Ever since, no healthcare agency or provider has been immune from the Drug Enforcement Agency’s (DEA) investigations. For nearly two years, the DEA has been aggressively investigating physicians, pharmacists, dentists, and other healthcare professionals for drug diversion.

Due to this, it is important healthcare providers understand the initial signs that could indicate they are under investigation, so they can take the necessary steps to address the problem quickly. The process you can expect if you are under investigation are below.

Patient File Audit

One of the first signs that you are under investigation for drug diversion is if you receive a request from the DEA asking for patient charts. This will come either from a commercial insurance carrier or a DEA subpoena. There are two reasons for this audit. The first is that you or your practice has been singled out based on a complaint either from a patient or through data comparison.

Continue Reading ››

Back to Top