Posted on December 11, 2014 in Criminal Defense

Not all conversations are admissible in court. The law gives special protection to communications between certain individuals, prohibiting the introduction of these communications in court. One of the more famous “protected conversations” is the conversation that takes place between an attorney and his or her client. The idea behind protecting these conversations from disclosure is to allow clients to speak freely and truthfully with their attorneys. Despite this legal protection, however, some law enforcement officers still attempt to listen into what clients tell their attorneys, a violation of that attorney-client privilege.

In a recent publicized case, a criminal defendant was brought in for an interview relating to a manslaughter investigation. As most such interviews are, this particular interview was recorded using a video camera and microphone. When police needed to take a break, they left the defendant in the interview room with his two defense attorneys – and they left the recording equipment on. Over the next 11 minutes of conversation, police recorded a discussion between the defendant his attorneys about trial strategy. Law enforcement claimed the eavesdropping was unintentional, while the defendant argued that not only were his constitutional rights violated, but that law enforcement violated federal and state eavesdropping laws.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on December 09, 2014 in Criminal Defense

Roughly nine out of every 10 criminal cases in the United States are resolved through some sort of plea agreement. Usually, these agreements require the defendant to accept some criminal liability for some criminal offense in return for a more lenient sentence or punishment. The manner in which the criminal defendant accepts or rejects liability for the charged crime is through entering a plea.

Types of Pleas in Illinois

 There are four types of pleas a criminal defendant may enter to charges in Illinois. Each type of plea can have serious ramifications, so it is best to consult with an Illinois criminal defense attorney before entering any plea:

• Not Guilty. A plea of not guilty is entered when the defendant denies that he or she is responsible for the crime charged. By entering this plea, it becomes necessary for the prosecution to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at a trial. A defendant who enters a not guilty plea is legally permitted to change his or her plea at a later time.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on December 04, 2014 in BAIID

Although all DUI charges are taken seriously in Illinois, being charged with a second or further offense can lead to critical penalties for you. One of the most important steps you can take after being charged with a DUI is to contact an experienced drunk driving defense attorney to manage your case. An experienced lawyer will review your case to ensure that your rights are protected and will work hard to advocate for you in court.

Multiple convictions can stack up and change how your charge is classified as well as what type of penalties you will face. Here’s what you need to know about the minimum punishments for multiple DUI offenses in Illinois:

• A second conviction is categorized as a Class A misdemeanor with mandatory minimum prison time of five days (or 240 community service hours). Your vehicle registration will be suspended and your driving privileges can be revoked for five years

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on December 02, 2014 in Criminal Defense

If this is your first time being accused of a DUI, you need to know your rights and you also need to take these charges seriously. Being convicted of DUI can lead to consequences, so your first step should be to hire a competent Illinois DUI attorney to handle your case. In Illinois, driving under the influence refers to a blood alcohol concentration of .08 or more, but it also refers to being impaired while under the influence of medication or any other illegal substance. If there’s evidence outside your .05-.08 BAC that you were otherwise impaired, you can also be convicted for driving under the influence.

If you are stopped at a sobriety checkpoint or pulled over and the officer has probable cause to suspect that you may be driving under the influence, you should be asked to submit to a chemical test. If you refuse to submit to the test or if you fail it, there are penalties, such as statutory summary suspension, that you may face. A first conviction for DUI will result in the revoking of your driving privileges for 1 year (and 2 years if you are under the age of 21) and the suspension of your vehicle registration.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on November 28, 2014 in Criminal Defense

In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the “burden” of proving the defendant is guilty of committing a crime. The standard used in criminal cases is “beyond a reasonable doubt.” In other words, a criminal defendant will not be found guilty of committing a crime unless the judge or jury is convinced “beyond a reasonable doubt” that the defendant committed the crime. What “beyond a reasonable doubt” means, however, is a tricky question.

The Parties Are Not Encouraged to Define Reasonable Doubt

In some criminal trials, the prosecutor, the court, and sometimes the defense attorney may try to define or explain what constitutes a “reasonable doubt.” For instance, the prosecutor may attempt to compare “reasonable doubt” with a puzzle missing only one piece. In this instance, the prosecutor would say, there is little doubt as to what the puzzle depicts even if all the pieces are not present. In another well-known example, a prosecutor attempted to explain that reasonable doubt was being beyond 95 percent certain that something occurred. In each of these cases, the respective courts found it was an error for the prosecutor to attempt to define or explain the reasonable doubt standard to jurors. Both cases were sent back to the trial courts for a retrial.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on November 25, 2014 in Criminal Defense

A centerpiece of many national political candidates’ platforms included some discussion about gun rights and gun laws in the United States. In the wake of various school shootings in the past few years and countless violent crimes committed daily, it is only natural that the country engages in a conversation about what regulations and laws are necessary to eliminate these tragic occurrences. Usually the conversation turns to a discussion of what federal gun laws are already “on the books,” including laws such as 18 USC Sec. 922(g) and (n). Under this law, which prohibits the possession of a firearm or ammunition by certain individuals, even first-time offenders face severe consequences.

Federal Statutes Prohibiting Possession of Firearms and Ammunition

 The federal statute prohibiting possession of a firearm or ammunition is found at 18 USC Sec. 922(g) and (n). Under this statute, certain groups of people are prohibited from possessing, receiving, shipping, transporting, or otherwise affecting interstate or foreign commerce with firearms and ammunition. The groups of people that are prohibited from doing so include:

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on November 20, 2014 in Criminal Defense

Even after you have been found guilty of an Illinois crime, as a criminal defendant you still have certain rights. These rights include the right to appeal your conviction and/or sentence and have an appellate court review your case. An appellate court can either affirm your conviction (meaning that you remain convicted of the crime), reverse your conviction (meaning that your conviction is vacated and you are no longer convicted of the crime), or remand your cases (meaning that there were some errors in your trial and/or sentencing that require the trial and/or sentencing hearing to be conducted again).

An Appeal is a Distinct Type of Proceeding

Some criminal defendants assume that their trial attorney can also function as their appellate attorney; however, there are important differences between court hearings in front of a trial court and the appeals process. Criminal defendants should make sure they hire competent appellate counsel who understand and appreciate these important differences:

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on November 18, 2014 in Uncategorized

Criminal law is constantly changing, especially with regard to the constitutional rights of criminal defendants. The U.S. Supreme Court can issue a decision that impacts the application of the law in Illinois and other states. When the law changes though, it may not change for everybody. That was the unfortunate lesson one defendant learned in a recent decision by the Chicago-based U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.

USA v. Gutierrez

In late 2012, the Drug Enforcement Agency and police in Indianapolis received a tip regarding alleged drug trafficking at a local residence. Police went to the residence and used a drug-sniffing dog (or K-9 unit) to identify the presence of illegal narcotics. The dog sniffed the door of the residence and alerted the officers to the presence of drugs. Police then obtained a warrant and entered the residence, leading to the defendant's arrest for illegal possession of methamphetamine.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on November 13, 2014 in Criminal Defense

While medical marijuana is now legal in Illinois for patients who comply with state law, it is still illegal for anyone to drive under the influence of marijuana. Not many people understand, however, the far reaching impact of Illinois’ strict per se drugged driving law. The law forbids people from operating a motor vehicle if they have any detectable level of marijuana present in body fluids.

Strict Standards & Punishments

Opponents of per se legislation argue that just the presence of cannabinoids from marijuana in the bloodstream does not adequately measure impairment. Although ingestion of THC only has an immediate, measurable deleterious effect on performance for up to three hours after use, it stays in the body as a metabolized non-active and detectable substance far longer. Because cannabinoids remain present in both blood and urine for up to 30 days, it is theoretically possible to be charged with a per se marijuana DUI for a joint smoked a month ago (even if done so legitimately under the state’s medical marijuana program).

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on November 12, 2014 in Criminal Defense

If you are a parent who has been linked to a case involving underage drinking or underage drinking and driving, it’s imperative that you seek out an attorney today. Being connected to such a case can have risky consequences for you and your child.

If your child has been accused of underage drinking , then both you and your child will need an attorney to face these charges in court. Individuals under the age of 21 in Illinois can be convicted for violating the Liquor Control Act for the receipt, possession, purchase, or consumption of alcohol, leading to suspension of driving privileges for six months on first convictions. Subsequent convictions will lead to additional consequences.

As an adult, providing alcohol to someone under the age of 21 is a Class A misdemeanor. A parent who knowingly allows individuals under the age of 21 to consume alcoholic beverages inside a private home or other private property can also be found guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. However, do not assume explicit consent or provision of alcohol is all that is required to be found guilty. Adults who fail to control access in the residence where alcohol is consumed by individuals under the legal age where this activity results in bodily harm to someone can be found guilty of a Class 4 felony.

Continue Reading ››